[Section 278AB]: Power of Principal Commissioner or Commissioner to Grant Immunity from Prosecution

Here’s a detailed analysis of Section 278AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which empowers the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner to grant immunity from prosecution in specific cases:

1. Overview of Section 278AB

Section 278AB provides a discretionary power to the Principal Commissioner/Commissioner to grant immunity from prosecution when:

  • A taxpayer’s settlement application under Section 245Cabates (terminates) under Section 245HA due to non-prosecution or non-compliance.
  • Prosecution proceedings have not yet been institutedpost-abatement.

Objective: To encourage cooperation and full disclosure of income after failed settlement attempts, reducing litigation.

2. Eligibility and Conditions

  1. When Can Immunity Be Sought?
    • The taxpayer must apply before prosecution beginsafter abatement.
    • If prosecution was already initiated before/during settlement, the taxpayer can still apply, but must do so before formal charges are filed.
  1. Granting Immunity

The Commissioner may grant immunity if satisfied that the taxpayer:

  1. Cooperated fullywith tax authorities post-abatement.
  2. Made a full and true disclosureof income and its sources.
  3. Complied with any conditions imposed(e.g., payment of taxes in installments).

3. Procedural Aspects

  • Application: No prescribed form, but must include evidence of cooperation and disclosure.
  • Timeline: The Commissioner must pass an order within 12 monthsof receiving the application.
  • Hearing Mandatory: No rejection without giving the taxpayer an opportunity to be heard.

4. Withdrawal of Immunity

Immunity may be withdrawn if:

  • The taxpayer violates conditions(e.g., non-payment of taxes).
  • Conceals material factsor submits false evidence post-immunity.
  • Effect: Prosecution resumes as if immunity was never granted.

5. Key Comparisons

ASPECT SECTION 278AB SECTION 273AA (IMMUNITY FROM PENALTY)
Scope Prosecution only Penalty only
Trigger Abatement of settlement proceedings Same, but for penalty proceedings
Conditions Cooperation + full disclosure Similar, plus payment of taxes
Judicial Review Final order (no appeal) Final order (no appeal)

6. Practical Implications

  • Strategic Use: Ideal for taxpayers who genuinely cooperatedbut faced abatement due to procedural issues.
  • Documentation: Maintain records of disclosures and correspondence with tax authorities.
  • Limitation: No immunity for willful fraud(e.g., fake invoices)
Scroll to Top

e-Book (PDF) - Download

income Tax Management
[ Tax Ready Reckoner ]
e-Book (PDF)

AYs : 2025-26 & 2026-27

Most Useful by …
> CA and Tax Professionals,
> Business Owner and Entrepreneurs,
> Individuals Filing Their Own Taxes,
> Financial Planners and Wealth Managers &
> Students and Academicians. 
> Coveting 28 Chapters with 1280 Pages