Here’s a detailed analysis of Section 278AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which empowers the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner to grant immunity from prosecution in specific cases:
1. Overview of Section 278AB
Section 278AB provides a discretionary power to the Principal Commissioner/Commissioner to grant immunity from prosecution when:
- A taxpayer’s settlement application under Section 245Cabates (terminates) under Section 245HA due to non-prosecution or non-compliance.
- Prosecution proceedings have not yet been institutedpost-abatement.
Objective: To encourage cooperation and full disclosure of income after failed settlement attempts, reducing litigation.
2. Eligibility and Conditions
- When Can Immunity Be Sought?
-
- The taxpayer must apply before prosecution beginsafter abatement.
- If prosecution was already initiated before/during settlement, the taxpayer can still apply, but must do so before formal charges are filed.
- Granting Immunity
The Commissioner may grant immunity if satisfied that the taxpayer:
- Cooperated fullywith tax authorities post-abatement.
- Made a full and true disclosureof income and its sources.
- Complied with any conditions imposed(e.g., payment of taxes in installments).
3. Procedural Aspects
- Application: No prescribed form, but must include evidence of cooperation and disclosure.
- Timeline: The Commissioner must pass an order within 12 monthsof receiving the application.
- Hearing Mandatory: No rejection without giving the taxpayer an opportunity to be heard.
4. Withdrawal of Immunity
Immunity may be withdrawn if:
- The taxpayer violates conditions(e.g., non-payment of taxes).
- Conceals material factsor submits false evidence post-immunity.
- Effect: Prosecution resumes as if immunity was never granted.
5. Key Comparisons
ASPECT | SECTION 278AB | SECTION 273AA (IMMUNITY FROM PENALTY) |
Scope | Prosecution only | Penalty only |
Trigger | Abatement of settlement proceedings | Same, but for penalty proceedings |
Conditions | Cooperation + full disclosure | Similar, plus payment of taxes |
Judicial Review | Final order (no appeal) | Final order (no appeal) |
6. Practical Implications
- Strategic Use: Ideal for taxpayers who genuinely cooperatedbut faced abatement due to procedural issues.
- Documentation: Maintain records of disclosures and correspondence with tax authorities.
- Limitation: No immunity for willful fraud(e.g., fake invoices)