Remedy Available Against the Order of The Commissioner (Appeals)/Revision Orders Of CIT

Under the Income Tax Act, 1961, taxpayers have several remedies against orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] or revision orders by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) under Sections 263/264. Here’s a structured overview:

1. Appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) [Section 253]

  • Applicability: An appeal lies before the ITAT against:
    • Orders of CIT(A) under Sections 250, 271, 271A, etc.
    • Revision orders under Section 263(CIT’s revision for revenue’s interest) or Section 264 (revision for assessee’s relief).
  • Time Limit: 60 days from the date of communication of the order.
  • Procedure: File Form 36with supporting documents (e.g., assessment order, grounds of appeal).
  • Key Points:
    • ITAT is the final fact-finding authority.
    • No new evidence can be submitted unless the Tribunal directs.
    • Monetary limits apply for departmental appeals (e.g., Rs. 60 lakh tax effect for ITAT appeals).

2. Appeal to the High Court [Section 260A]

  • Applicability: Only if a substantial question of lawarises from ITAT’s order.
  • Time Limit: 120 days from ITAT’s order.
  • Procedure: File a memorandum of appeal with the High Court.
  • Key Points:
    • High Court may admit the appeal if the question is novel or impacts revenue/assessee significantly.
    • Examples include disputes over legal interpretations (e.g., applicability of a tax exemption).

3. Appeal to the Supreme Court [Section 261]

  • Applicability: Against High Court’s order, with leave of the High Court or via Special Leave Petition (SLP)under Article 136 of the Constitution.
  • Scope: Limited to cases involving national importance or conflicting judgments.

4. Writ Jurisdiction (Article 226/227 of the Constitution)

  • Applicability: If the order violates natural justiceor is patently illegal.
    • Example: CIT(A) denies a hearing, or CIT exceeds revisionary powers under Section 263/264.
  • Key Points:
    • Direct approach to High Court, bypassing ITAT.
    • Used when no alternative remedyis effective (e.g., jurisdictional errors).

5. Revision by CIT Under Section 264

  • For Assessees: If CIT(A)’s order is erroneous but not prejudicial to revenue, the assessee can apply for revision within 1 yearof the order.
    • CIT can grant relief but cannot enhance liability.
    • No appeal against CIT’s order; only writ petitions are viable.

6. Key Differences Between Appeals and Revisions

ASPECT APPEAL (CIT(A)/ITAT) REVISION (CIT)
Initiated by Assessee/Revenue Assessee (Section 264) or CIT (Section 263)
Scope Factual & legal issues Correct errors prejudicial to revenue (263) or grant relief (264)
Further Appeal ITAT → High Court → Supreme Court Only writ petitions (for Section 264)
Time Limit 30–60 days (appeals) 1 year (revision)

7. Practical Considerations

  • Appeals vs. Revisions: Appeals are generally preferred over revisions due to structured judicial scrutiny.
  • Doctrine of Merger: If an order is appealed, CIT cannot revise it under Section 263 (as held in ITAT quashes CIT’s revision order).
  • Delay Condonation: Possible for appeals/revisions with “sufficient cause”
Scroll to Top

e-Book (PDF) - Download

income Tax Management
[ Tax Ready Reckoner ]
e-Book (PDF)

AYs : 2025-26 & 2026-27

Most Useful by …
> CA and Tax Professionals,
> Business Owner and Entrepreneurs,
> Individuals Filing Their Own Taxes,
> Financial Planners and Wealth Managers &
> Students and Academicians. 
> Coveting 28 Chapters with 1280 Pages